This group project was done during my MA, in collaboration with This Ain’t Rock ’n Roll. They are the creators of the Brixton Pound, a local currency that was temporarily used in the south of London. Currently, this currency is being developed into a digital tokenized version (cryptocurrency), which will be implemented in the Algorand blockchain.
To support the initiative, our brief challenged us to design a way to materialize the blockchain. But what does it mean exactly to materialize the blockchain? How can such an intangible concept become tangible? What metaphors come into play? The answer: a shop that owns itself. Yes, that’s possible.
The Project
The Brixspot is a series of autonomous shops found all over Brixton. Through blockchain technology, people can donate items in exchange for others. The machine will track your experience through a hidden camera documenting your transaction, and a voice over guiding (and judging) your performance. However, this experience is not for everyone. It can only be activated with a secret code shared by your trusted connections.
Brixspot initially bought its shares from its investors, thus claiming its ownership. By donating, you will be part of its community. As the shop owns itself, you will not manage it. Instead you’ll be participating in making important decisions such as voting for proposals for the next Brixspot theme. Indeed, the kind of exchangeable objects varies by season.
Desk Research
In short, the blockchain is a decentralized ledgering system. It is most commonly used as a way to record transactions across several computers connected through a peer-to-peer network. It is immutable and transparent, which makes it trustworthy.
Lit Review: Artists Rethinking The Blockchain
Catlow, R., Garrett, M., Jones, N. and Skinner, S.
This book lead us to two main blockchain application examples from which we built our project on. Plantoids and terra 0 belong to a category of objects called Decentralized Autonomous Organisations (DAOs), which are corporations that can maintain themselves without human intervention. This concept suits the people of Brixton’s beliefs about the loss of a “centralized” leading figure, perhaps to rely more on building trust in their communities.
terra 0
A self-owned forest. It would first start off with project initiators buying a forest, which would later sell licenses to log its own trees. It would thus accumulate capitals, allowing it to later buy itself from the initial investors, granting it its ownership. The now augmented-forest-user would be able to finance itself, buy more land and expand. This example expanded my horizons on the blockchain’s possibility to realize autonomous organizations.
Plantoids
They're digital plants being able to reproduce themselves through blockchain technology. With smart-contracts, it gathers funds from donors and artists who would also submit proposals for the design of the next Plantoid. Donors would be able to participate in the decision making process for the selected design and the issues concerning its realisation. This finding was mostly insightful as it opened our eyes to the making of self-sufficient products, through blockchain technology.
Co-Designing Session
In order to acquire new perspectives and explore alternative applications of the blockchain, we conducted a co-designing workshop in which people would experience and question the blockchain’s consensus mechanism through the
Pure Proof of Stake (PPoS). It is a voting system relying on how much stake you have; the latter allows you to play the lottery a certain number of times.
What was interesting is that we found everyone questioning the validity of the system: “Why do I have to deposit something to participate? Why can’t this be more simple?”. This was a first step for me to realize how challenging it will be for us to make our design accessible and understandable to people, as the blockchain is a very complex system to grasp.
VISITING BRIXTON
A short trip to the heart of our project was unavoidable. Amongst our findings were a moveable bookstore, in which people can donate their books, or take other ones for free. We also heard about a collective fridge in which people can exchange food. These two examples successfully highlight the sense of community and trust among Brixton residents.
A revelation
During our Crazy-8 session, we realized that a common point for our ideas would an exchange of items of any kind as a way to support each other as a community. The blockchain would be used to store and collect the data. This suggestion quickly led us to the idea: A shop that owns itself.
As a DAO, it would be able to own itself by buying itself from its initial investors, after it has gathered enough funds to do so. Also, similarly to Plantoids, it would also be able to reproduce itself. It could invite people to submit proposals for the realization of its next venue in a different location in Brixton.
First Prototype
The difficulty in this process was the question of human intervention. Taking this away did not only make its realization harder for us, but would perhaps also question people’s trust in it. How can we prevent it to become weaponized? We decided that the shop would be moveable, so it does not have to be fixed in a specific area (thus pay rent!). The shop would be a corner in which people would lend and/or borrow items:
- To ensure that people would place valuable items, we came up with the Proof Of Use (PoU). Through a set of smart-contracts, people would be able to store their items in the shop for a specific amount of time only (48 hours). If someone takes it out before then, the timer pauses. Otherwise, it would move into the ‘unwanted section’. The longer the timer takes to reach 0, the more the item in question would be considered “valuable”.
- The items exchanged do not have a monetary value. Instead, the shop gathers funds from donations by people, who would “pay as they feel". Donors will be are able to vote and select the proposal for the next shop by defining its look, location and function. The proposal with the most votes would be automated by smart-contracts.
- In order to exchange an item, you need an account and a password. You can either use a mobile application, or use a physical card as an alternative.
-All stores would be connected through smart-contracts. They would able to transfer data and support each other through a system of automated network
Speed Dating and Futher Prototyping
The speed datings followed by testing sessions were incredibly insightful, and revealed the need for huge shifts in our designs. Some participants made us feel like we did not reach the intentions we were willing to reach. Questions about the possible vandalism acts, theft, and even finding an incentive for the “pay as you feel scheme”, were all still there.
- Word Of Mouth: Instead of using QR codes and usernames with passwords to unlock the store, the experience would be accessible through a secret code or phrase. It would be limitedly shared across the Brixton community by people who trust each other enough keep the code as private as possible. This affirms the notion of trust among the Brixton community.
- No phones: You would not a mobile application to reserve items on the Brixspots. It would ensure that it is equally accessible to everyone. You would only need to create an account if you wish to donate to the Brixspot, thus participate in the voting of proposals. Additionally, we figured that one does not simply experience the blockchain through an interface design. The brief was to materialize the blockchain and make it experienceable, thus a simple interface design may be a little too limiting.
- Each transaction would be automatically recorded and printed in a transparent box. This was used to reflect on the blockchain’s transparency. Although we could have found a more sustainable option, this method remains in my opinion a good way to materialize the blockchain.
- Every Brixspot would be different than the other one. The proposals would not only suggest design of the shop, but would also suggest potential themes and categories of items to be exchanged, which would reflect people’s needs.
FINAL THOUGHTS
The notion of ownership is apparent “behind the curtains”, by having the shop buying itself from the investors. However, this may not be experienceable, thus understandable, by potential participants.We did nevertheless tried to take a step closer. We included sounds (recorded by Alex), from which the shop would not only communicate instructions to its participants, but would also be able to judge on the value of the items given. I also realized that it was important to make it apparent that the shop would be presented to its potential users as a peer, and not as a tool, creating a mutually beneficial relationship between them. If we had more time, this could have been considered as a first step towards a post-human project.